If you click on a link and make a purchase we may receive a small commission. Read our editorial policy.
Something is Killing the Children has Weapons to thank for becoming a hot Hollywood property
Not entirely, of course - Something is Killing the Children's marketability comes from many places including writer James Tynion IV, original artist Werther Dell'Edera, and the legion of loyal BOOM! Studios readers. But Zach Cregger's horror hit Weapons didn't hurt

Popverse's top stories
- Need a last-minute costume? Critical Role and Spirit Halloween have you covered
- Here's how to watch all the New York Comic Con 2025 panels
- Hazbin Hotel actor explains how Alastor's place on the aro/ace spectrum helped him understand why the show deeply connected with fans
Look, we were just so thrilled that hit horror comic Something is Killing the Children is finally getting the big (and small) screen treatment (from Blumhouse, no less!) that we didn't even think to ask why. I mean, there's the whole horror renaissance going on, not to mention the wild success of James Tynion IV's comic book projects, so we could've just written it off as being the right project for the right time. But according to a recent report, there's a particular, perhaps unexpected key to SIKTC's recent marketability:
Zach Cregger's horror hit from this summer, Weapons.
The report in question is The Hollywood Reporter's announcement of SIKTC's upcoming film and TV adaptation, published October 24. As they reported on the upcoming Blumhouse/BOOM! collaboration, the outlet cites unnamed sources who claim Weapons as making the property more desirable from a studio standpoint.
While we don't know who those sources are or have our own saying the same thing, this would make a ton of sense: Much of Weapons' plot is about children dealing with a supernatural terror and a community of adults that must bear the repercussions. And in terms of sheer marketability, you can refer to Popverse's reporting on the landmark success of Weapons as a reason Blumhouse would be extremely interested in SIKTC.
Weapons also arguably demonstrated that audiences will show up not only brand new horror concepts, but brand new horror concepts that are made on a relatively tight budget: Weapons only cost $38 million to make, as per reports, which is less than a fifth of what Marvel's The Fantastic Four: First Steps cost. No wonder that studios were interested in SIKTC - it not only has a Weapons-esque appeal, but with the comic book series approaching its 50th issue already, there's in-built franchise and sequel potential waiting to be exploited.
Now that we know that horror hits help get future horror hits made, what are the chances that the fuzzy success of Five Nights at Freddy's will get us a Beneath the Trees Where Nobody Sees movie in the future?
In the immortal words of Danny Elfman, "Life's no fun without a good scare." Join Popverse's weekly explorations of the best opening moments of horror cinema in The Coldest Open, and then check out:
- The best horror movies of all time, according to horror aficionado Greg Silber
- The most underrated horror movies from the past couple years
- All the new and upcoming horror movies for 2025 and beyond
And much gore. Er, more. Much more.
Follow Popverse for upcoming event coverage and news
Find out how we conduct our review by reading our review policy
Let Popverse be your tour guide through the wilderness of pop culture
Sign in and let us help you find your new favorite thing.
















Comments
Want to join the discussion? Please activate your account first.
Visit Reedpop ID if you need to resend the confirmation email.